TLDR: A recent research paper analyzes the #StopAirtelThefty Twitter campaign in Uganda, revealing widespread public dissatisfaction and significant security vulnerabilities in mobile money services. The study, based on sentiment analysis of tweets, highlights issues like fraud, failed transactions, poor customer service, and SIM swap incidents, leading to substantial monetary losses for users. It concludes with urgent recommendations for service providers, regulators, and consumers to enhance security, accountability, and restore trust in Uganda’s digital financial ecosystem.
Mobile money services have become a cornerstone of financial inclusion in Uganda, transforming daily financial activities for millions. Services like paying school fees, utility bills, and conducting business transactions have become more efficient and accessible. However, a recent study highlights significant security concerns and user dissatisfaction, particularly brought to light by the #StopAirtelThefty Twitter campaign in August 2025.
The Rise of Mobile Money and Its Challenges
Uganda’s mobile money revolution began in 2009 with MTN, quickly followed by other operators like Airtel. This rapid adoption led to mobile money surpassing traditional bank account usage by 2013. Today, MTN Mobile Money (MoMo) and Airtel Money are the leading providers, with millions of subscribers. While these services have advanced, even introducing virtual card technologies in 2025 for online payments, the question of security for subscribers’ funds remains paramount.
In April 2025, MTN Group acknowledged a cybersecurity incident affecting customer information, though core financial systems remained secure. More significantly, August 2025 saw a wave of public concern regarding mobile money fraud on Airtel Money. Users reported unauthorized access to accounts, fund withdrawals, and even loans taken out without consent. Initially, Airtel Uganda reportedly dismissed these allegations, but the sheer volume of complaints prompted the Bank of Uganda to intervene, urging formal complaint channels. Subsequently, Airtel Mobile Commerce Uganda Limited (AMCUL) issued an apology and pledged a review of security protocols.
Unpacking the #StopAirtelThefty Campaign
The #StopAirtelThefty campaign on X (formerly Twitter) was spearheaded by Dr. Jim Spire Ssentongo, a Makerere University Professor, after he experienced a personal loss involving his late brother’s Airtel Money account. This campaign became a focal point for public anxiety over the safety of mobile money.
A recent research paper, titled “A software security review on Uganda’s Mobile Money Services: Dr . Jim Spire’s tweets sentiment analysis,” systematically examined 3,471 tweets related to this campaign. The analysis revealed that Airtel Money accounted for the vast majority of telecom-related tweets (2,780), with MTN MoMo contributing 552, often in comparative complaints. Out of these, 1,119 tweets were direct complaints, primarily against Airtel Money and MTN MoMo.
Key Findings: User Complaints and Monetary Losses
The study categorized complaints into several key issues:
- Fraud: This was the most frequent complaint, accounting for 30% of Airtel’s issues and a significant portion for MTN.
- Network Problems: Users frequently reported issues with network reliability.
- Customer Service: Many expressed dissatisfaction with the responsiveness and effectiveness of customer support.
- Service Quality, Charges, PIN Issues, Transaction Issues, and Account Issues: These also contributed to user grievances.
The financial impact was substantial. Approximately 125 incidents of monetary loss were identified, totaling around UGX 1.47 billion (approximately $412,068 USD). Airtel accounted for UGX 778 million across 97 incidents, while MTN reported UGX 694 million over 28 incidents.
Deep Dive into User Experiences
The research highlighted several recurring themes from user complaints:
- Unexplained Deductions and Failed Transactions: Users reported funds being deducted without reaching recipients, with some cases remaining unresolved for years.
- Delayed or Absent Reversals: Even with reversal confirmations, funds often failed to reflect in accounts, leading to significant losses.
- Customer Service Gaps and Institutional Apathy: Many found customer care ineffective, dismissive, or inaccessible, with some being asked to seek court orders for small amounts.
- SIM Swap and Mobile Money Theft: Numerous reports detailed SIM card theft followed by rapid, unauthorized withdrawals and loans, raising questions about PIN protection and internal security.
- Arbitrary Blocking and Account Restrictions: Accounts were reportedly blocked without clear reasons, sometimes with large sums of money, causing financial distress.
- Predatory Loan Deductions and Opaque Terms: Users questioned the fairness of loan products, citing hidden deductions and unclear repayment terms.
- Loss of Confidence and Customer Migration: A growing number of users expressed fear, withdrawing funds and switching to rival platforms or limiting their mobile money usage.
- Perceptions of Systemic Theft and Lack of Accountability: Many customers accused providers, particularly Airtel, of systematic malpractice, with suspicions of internal staff complicity.
Also Read:
- Unmasking Web Fraud: A New Threat to LLM-Driven Multi-Agent Systems
- Securing AI on the Go: A Look at Privacy and Security in Mobile Large Language Models
Moving Forward: Recommendations for a Secure Digital Future
The study concludes that the crisis surrounding Airtel Money in August 2025 was not an isolated incident but a symptom of broader structural and governance challenges. To restore trust and ensure the sustainability of digital finance in Uganda, the paper offers several recommendations:
For Service Providers: There is an urgent need to enhance authentication mechanisms, moving beyond single-factor PINs to multi-factor authentication or biometrics. Investment in advanced, real-time fraud detection systems is crucial. Providers must also implement transparent and auditable reversal and refund policies, along with clearer communication of loan terms. Customer service reforms, including responsive teams and independent ombudsman models, are vital. Finally, strengthening staff integrity controls through limited access rights and independent audits can deter insider fraud.
For Regulators: Stricter oversight and enforcement of mobile money operations are required, with clear penalties for non-compliance. Establishing a centralized fraud reporting system and a mandatory compensation policy for users affected by negligence are also recommended. Regulators should demand greater public accountability from providers, including regular reports on security incidents.
For Consumers: Nationwide financial literacy campaigns are essential to educate users on common fraud tactics and safe practices. Consumers should also be encouraged to manage their mobile wallet balances wisely and utilize formal complaint channels provided by regulators.
Ultimately, cross-sector collaboration among telecom operators, banks, and fintechs is crucial to standardize security protocols and improve interoperability. Continuous research and innovation are also needed to address emerging fraud trends. The future viability of mobile money in Uganda hinges on addressing these persistent security and trust deficits. You can read the full research paper here: A software security review on Uganda’s Mobile Money Services: Dr . Jim Spire’s tweets sentiment analysis.
